Tree Cover, Understory, and Biodiversity Relationships in Savanna Ecosystems

Savannas represent complex ecosystems characterized by the coexistence of trees and grasses, creating intricate relationships between canopy structure, understory vegetation, and overall biodiversity patterns. The relationship between tree cover, understory development, and biodiversity in savannas is fundamentally shaped by resource competition, environmental gradients, and structural complexity.

Structural Organization of Savanna Ecosystems

Savannas are defined by their distinctive vegetation structure, featuring an open canopy that allows sufficient light penetration to support a continuous herbaceous layer dominated by C4 grasses and forbs. This structural arrangement creates multiple vertical strata: the overstory tree canopy, the understory shrub layer, and the herbaceous ground layer, each supporting distinct plant communities and biodiversity patterns.​

The herbaceous layer, comprising primarily grasses and non-woody herbaceous plants (forbs), forms the foundational stratum of savanna ecosystems. Forbs constitute the largest component of herbaceous species richness in savanna ecosystems, often showing little variation across gradients of tree and shrub cover. This continuous herbaceous layer distinguishes savannas from forests, where canopy closure typically suppresses ground vegetation.​

Tree Canopy Effects on Understory Vegetation

Tree canopies exert both facilitative and competitive effects on understory vegetation through multiple mechanisms. The net effect depends on environmental context, particularly rainfall patterns and resource availability.​

Light Competition and Shading Effects

Tree canopies significantly reduce light availability for understory vegetation through shading. Below-canopy grasses face reduced light availability, which can negatively impact photosynthesis and growth of shade-intolerant species. Studies have shown that canopy effects on understory composition and productivity depend upon rainfall, tree cover, and the persistence of leaves on trees.​

Dense tree canopies generally suppress understory productivity, particularly in areas receiving more than 50 cm annual precipitation, where light becomes increasingly limiting. The architectural differences between tree species, including canopy depth and shape, influence light transmission to understory plants, with deeper, more global crowns creating higher shade intensity than shallow, hemispherical crowns.​

Resource Competition and Facilitation

The relationship between trees and understory vegetation involves complex interactions of competition and facilitation. Trees compete with grasses for water, nutrients, and light, but may also facilitate grass growth through several mechanisms.​

In arid environments (mean annual precipitation ≤550 mm), tree effects are often facilitative, with higher grass biomass observed beneath tree canopies than in open areas. This facilitation occurs through enhanced nutrient availability, creation of favorable microclimates, and hydraulic lift - the process by which trees transport water from deeper soil layers to surface layers, making it available to shallow-rooted grasses.​

However, in more mesic conditions, competition typically outweighs facilitation. Trees with extensive lateral root systems may extract water rapidly from upper soil layers, creating stronger competitive pressure on grasses that occupy similar rooting zones. This competition can result in lower soil moisture content under tree canopies and reduced grass biomass.​

Biodiversity Patterns Across Tree Cover Gradients

Species Richness and Diversity Relationships

The relationship between tree cover and biodiversity in savannas exhibits complex, non-linear patterns. Contrary to expectations, studies have found that tree species richness and diversity do not necessarily increase linearly from grasslands to forests. Mixed grasslands and riparian forests may have similarly low levels of tree species richness compared to intermediate woodland physiognomies.​

Understory plant communities show distinct responses to tree functional identity. Forest trees and pines negatively correlate with cover and density of C4 graminoid species - a defining functional group linked to ecosystem flammability - while savanna trees show weaker negative relationships. This suggests that tree functional identity is crucial in determining overstory-understory relationships and maintaining savanna structure.​

Vertical Stratification and Community Structure

Savanna ecosystems exhibit strong vertical stratification of species assemblages, with ground-dwelling and arboreal communities showing distinct compositions. The degree of vertical stratification varies with environmental conditions, increasing along latitudinal gradients with decreasing temperature and increasing rainfall.​

Studies of ant assemblages in Brazilian savannas demonstrate that vertical stratification creates greater species composition differences than horizontal geographic variation across distances up to 1,500 km. This vertical partitioning extends beyond arthropods to plant communities, where approximately 65% of dominant species are limited to single vegetation strata.​

Environmental Controls and Management Implications

Climate and Disturbance Interactions

The balance between tree cover and understory biodiversity is strongly mediated by climate variables, particularly rainfall patterns and seasonality. Fire frequency and intensity play crucial roles in maintaining open savanna structure by limiting woody encroachment and promoting grass dominance.​

Higher levels of woody plant aggregation are associated with high rainfall seasonality, low mean annual precipitation, fine-textured soils, and relatively flat terrain - factors that also influence the formation of periodic vegetation patterns. These environmental gradients create spatial heterogeneity in tree-grass relationships and associated biodiversity patterns.​

Diversity-Productivity Relationships

The relationship between biodiversity and productivity in savannas is influenced by tree cover and environmental context. Annual aboveground wood carbon increment shows positive relationships with species richness and alpha diversity, particularly during wet years when water availability is adequate. This suggests that maintaining diversity in savanna woodlands is important for maximizing carbon storage and ecosystem productivity.​

However, climate change effects, including warming and drying trends, may limit the importance of diversity on wood carbon storage and alter existing tree-grass-biodiversity relationships.

​                                

Synthesis and Ecological Significance

The relationship between tree cover, understory development, and biodiversity in savannas represents a dynamic equilibrium maintained by complex interactions among resource competition, environmental gradients, and disturbance regimes. Tree canopies create spatial heterogeneity in light, water, and nutrient availability, leading to distinct microhabitats that support different plant communities and biodiversity patterns.

Understanding these relationships is crucial for savanna conservation and management, particularly as climate change and anthropogenic disturbances continue to alter ecosystem structure and function. The vertical stratification patterns and tree-grass interactions that characterize savannas contribute significantly to their exceptional biodiversity, making them among the most species-rich ecosystems globally while supporting unique assemblages adapted to the savanna's distinctive environmental conditions. 

References

​Larger trees facilitate understory herbaceous biomass but... (2025). ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0254629925000341​

Pine trees structure plant biodiversity patterns in savannas. (2024). Ecology and Evolution. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ece3.70021​

Diversity-productivity relationships of savanna ecosystems. (2024). Frontiers in Forests and Global Change. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/forests-and-global-change/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2024.1380600/pdf​

Understory vegetation in fast-growing tree plantations on... (1997). Forest Ecology and Management. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378112797001953​

 Understory plant communities and the functional distinction... (2013, February 24). PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23691661/​

Restoring savannas and tropical herbaceous ecosystems. (2025, January 4). Encyclopédie de l'environnement. https://www.encyclopedie-environnement.org/en/life/restoring-savannas-and-tropical-herbaceous-ecosystems-2/​

Tree - Grass Interactions on an East African Savanna. Wageningen University. https://edepot.wur.nl/199104​

Forb ecology research in dry African savannas. (2019, June 1). PMC. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6635924/​

When tree planting actually damages ecosystems. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/when-tree-planting-actually-damages-ecosystems-120786​

 When Planting Trees Threatens Forests. (2020, August 25). Earth.Org. https://earth.org/plant-trees-threaten-forests/​

When planting trees does more harm than good. Deutsche Welle. https://www.dw.com/en/when-planting-trees-does-more-harm-than-good/a-56940591​

'Bad science': Planting frenzy misses the grasslands for the trees. (2024, July 20). Mongabay. https://news.mongabay.com/2021/05/bad-science-planting-frenzy-misses-the-grasslands-for-the-trees/​

Clarifying the confusion: old-growth savannahs and tropical... (2016, September 18). Royal Society Publishing. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2015.0306​

Afforestation of savannas: an impending ecological disaster. (2016, June 30). Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation. https://www.perspectecolconserv.com/en-afforestation-savannas-an-impending-ecological-articulo-S1679007316300779​

Community-Driven Restoration is Making a Difference in Ghana. AFR100. https://afr100.org/project/community-driven-restoration-making-difference-ghana​

Restoring Grasslands and Savannahs: Reviving the Planet's Overlooked Powerhouses. (2025, June 30). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. https://www.decadeonrestoration.org/restoring-grasslands-and-savannahs-reviving-planets-overlooked-powerhouses​

Human impacts in African savannas are mediated by plant... New Phytologist. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.15236​

Strategic management of livestock to improve biodiversity... Journal of Applied Ecology. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2664.12591​

Plantations and pastoralists: afforestation activities make... Semantic Scholar. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/99fb/b9a077018b540b3f0627e24d47abf22bebc5.pdf​

Digging Deep: Fire suppression may not help savannahs as much as previously thought. (2022, March 24). The Indian Express. https://indianexpress.com/article/technology/science/digging-deep-fire-suppression-may-not-help-savannahs-as-much-as-previously-thought-7834792/​

Ecosystem restoration in fire-managed savanna woodlands. (2020, May 24). PMC. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7708610/​

Fire suppression results in lower-than-expected soil carbon gains in savanna. Journal of Ecology Blog. https://jecologyblog.com/2023/09/28/fire-suppression-results-in-lower-than-expected-soil-carbon-gains-in-savanna/​

Assessing the fire resilience of the savanna tree... Acta Oecologica. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1146609X21000278​

Invasive plants affecting protected areas in West Africa. PAPACO. https://papaco.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Invasive-plants-study.pdf​

Statement: Monoculture Tree Plantations Are Not Forests! (2023, February 5). Global Forest Coalition. https://globalforestcoalition.org/statement-monoculture-tree-plantations-are-not-forests/​

Water use and water productivity of Eucalyptus plantations... ACIAR. https://www.aciar.gov.au/sites/default/files/legacy/tr_89-web.pdf​

Is the reputation of Eucalyptus plantations for using... (2022, October 26). HESS. https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/5357/2022/​

The Carbon Paradox: How Tree Plantations May Harm More Than Help. (2025, March 9). SciTechDaily. https://scitechdaily.com/the-carbon-paradox-how-tree-plantations-may-harm-more-than-help/​

Stamping out savanna fires doesn't bolster carbon sink by much, study finds. Mongabay. https://news.mongabay.com/2022/03/stamping-out-savanna-fires-doesnt-bolster-carbon-sink-by-much-study-finds/​

The biodiversity cost of carbon sequestration in tropical savanna. (2017, August 29). PMC. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5576881/